在半乾板上調低支票


2

遊戲是1/2現金,一般情況下,對有好感的玩家來說是9-max。V是MTT的參與者,正在調整現金,因此具有合理的基本面且不會異常偏離。能夠在合理的位置虛張聲勢。

V籌集了10美元的UTG(標準價格為7到10美元,因此價格合理)

英雄3-bet AA至$ 30。折成V誰跟注。

翻牌是Q J 7彩虹。底池$ 60

英雄下注$ 30,V跟注。

轉為Q J 7 5彩虹。底池$ 120

英雄下注$ 40。V支票加價至$ 90。英雄召喚。

河是Q J 7 5 8.底池$ 300

V下注$ 145。英雄?

由於價格高昂,所以感覺就像是一個緊急電話,但也覺得Hero在這個地方幾乎從來都不是好人。如果AA是個虛張聲勢的人,如果Hero認為V虛張聲勢,Hero可以利用折讓嗎?

1

I think that hero is probably not good here, his line seems very strong. Not sure if V check-raises a lot, but that is the part of the hand that makes me think that he has 2 pair or better. Otherwise, a lot of hands like KQ, AQ, even AK, AJ, AT, QT could take this line if V likes to get very aggressive

If you think that hero is under-bluffing because of the check-raise or some other read that you have on him, I think that you should definitely fold here. V's lead on the river also seems pretty strong to me, almost seems like V flopped a set or 2-pair and he doesn't want to lose value by checking and hero checking back.

Ultimately, if V is deep stacked, likes to splash around, and likes to bluff, then I think that you can call here. Otherwise, he is probably pretty strong here and you should fold.


1

Let's look at each street. Because stacksize is unknown I assume you are ~200BB deep and you are in position, because he check-raised the turn.

Pre-flop:

AA is a 3-bet almost all of the time. You should definitely call sometimes, but the majority of the time you should 3-bet. So I like the 3-bet, but your sizing is too small. I'd like to see at least $35, but probably $40 or even $45. It depends on exactly how deep you are, but you should size up here.

Flop:

This is a very good board for your range, which generally means you should bet a lot. AA is a strong hand and doesn't block your opponent's value range like QQ or JJ would, so this is a clear bet. You can slowplay other hands. I think half pot is again a little too small. You are missing out on value and giving him a great price to call with draws like KT and T9. Bet 60-75% of the pot and put him in a tough spot.

Turn:

Again a good turn. Nothing changes. You still have a significant range advantage. The majority of the time you should be betting here, but $40 is a way too small and to be honest really confusing bet. You got the goods. Get some value! Try betting a size where you can shove the river and stack a queen or a jack. Even if you have to bet close to the amount of the pot. You have AA-JJ. Put him in a tough spot. You wouldn't want to bet this size with bluffs, so why do it with value?

Now having bet $40 and facing a raise this small there is really no decision. You should call and see what happens. Raising with this particular hand doesn't make too much sense.

River:

Will he play this way as a bluff? It is hard to say. I always think it is important to play a good strategy and then (slightly) adjust it to counter what your opponent is doing.

So what kind of hands will get to the river like this? The only person that can answer this is you, as I don't know how you play. I am just roughly guessing here, but you might get here with AK, AA-JJ and a couple bluffs pre-flop that couldn't fold turn like AQ, KT, QJ, which should be 3-bet a low, but not zero percentage of the time pre-flop.

So you call with QJ, QQ, JJ and fold KT, AK. You should probably fold KK, because you block KT. So far you only have like 5-10 calling combinations depending on how often you 3-bet JJ, QJ and maybe T9. He might never bluff here, but aces just need to be in your calling range. If he has it, he has it. Playing it like this you know your strategy is sound and if you lose you'll get him the next hand.


-1

This question shows a fallacy that a lot of poker players get themselves into: Over valuing some meaningless factor.

In this case, it's "if he thinks V is under-bluffing".

How do you think that? So you think these things:

  1. He is apt to raise 5x, then call 15x from UTG in $1-2. [This is basically a sign of a total fish in $1-2.]

  2. You can figure out his "under-bluffing" rate.

This is absurd. You cannot know if he under bluffs, and his incredibly weak play pre-flop does not indicate any reason for you to think this. In fact, his pre-flop play lends itself to him being a "typical" 1-2 fish, which means you absolutely cannot think he "underbluffs".