在學術論文中,您是否應該提及/引用"定義"或"定理"之類的東西?還是它們是"文本流"的一部分?


1

我不確定我的問題是否完全是主觀的。我問,因為也許有一種"標準"的方式來做到這一點。我對此一無所獲,因為它很難搜索。

在學術論文中,您具有不同類型的環境,例如示例,圖形,定義,定理等。

我從未確定您是否必須在文本中提及這些內容(如"定義5定義了...的概念" ,這聽起來很奇怪)。我知道您應該經常提及圖形,因為它們通常放置在"文本流"之外以優化佈局和內容。但是其他人呢?

更清楚地說:我應該這樣做

This is some text. Definition 5 shows an important thing.

Definition 5: Something is defined

The text continues with some statements, now that Definition 5 has been applied.

或者這個

This is some text.

Definition 5: Something is defined

The text continues with some statements, now that Definition 5 has been applied.

提及提及的定義有時會很奇怪,因為沒有太多可供選擇的組合("定義5顯示","定義5狀態",...)

謝謝!

1

Usually - this is how it's done at my university - you write a definition of a term before applying it in a context. In that manner you make sure that the reader understands your view of the terminology and you can show that the definition has been scientifically researched and compared to its various interpretations.

"Rap is commonly known as... Mayer (1976), whereas Stevens (2002) thinks that rap is... In the following when using the terminology of "rap" I agree with Mayer (1976)."